Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wireless Alliance, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al, No. 2:23-cv-00095 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 22, 2024)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00095, Dkt. No. 240
Decided
October 22, 2024
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 79
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Wireless Alliance, LLC’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Claim Construction Order (Docket No. 79) . Docket No. 89. Defendants AT&T Services Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Intervenors Nokia of America Corporation and Ericsson Inc. responded to Plaintiff’s objections. Docket No. 93. Upon review of these objections, the Court finds the Magistrate Judge’s construction of the claim “predetermined time” is correct.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case