Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Wireless Alliance, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al, No. 2:23-cv-00095 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00095, Dkt. No. 245
Decided
October 24, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 106 Sealed Motion to Strike the Testimony of Plaintiff Wireless Alliance LLCs damages expert Jim W. Bergman
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike the Testimony of Plaintiff Wireless Alliance LLC’s damages expert Jim W. Bergman filed by Defendants AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Corp., T -Mobile USA, Inc., and Cellco Partnership d/b/a/ Verizon Wireless. Dkt. No. 106. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the Motion. I.