Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Entropic Communications, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 28, 2023)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00125, Dkt. No. 355
Decided
November 28, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - Court finds that the Motion for Leave (Dkt. No. 244) should be and hereby is DENIED. Court finds that the Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 245) should be and hereby is DENIED
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are two Motions. The first is Plaintiff Entropic Communications, LLC’s Opposed Motion for Leave to File Out of Time Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Testimony and Documents Improperly Withheld as Privileged (the “Motion for Leave”). (Dkt. No. 244.) The Second is Entropic’s Opposed Motion to Compel Testimony and Documents Improperly Withheld as Privileged (the “Motion to Compel”). (Dkt. No. 245.) Defendant Charter Communications, Inc. opposes both motions. (See Dkt. Nos.