Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Entropic Communications, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 28, 2023)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00125, Dkt. No. 353
Decided
November 28, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the Motion for Leave (Dkt. No. 287) should be and hereby is GRANTED. Court finds that the Supplemental Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 289) should be and hereby is DENIED.Court f…
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are three motions, all brought by Plaintiff Entropic Communications, LLC. The first is Entropic’s Motion to Strike Opinions of Christopher Bakewell (the “Motion to Strike”). (Dkt. No. 174.) The second is Entropic’s Opposed Motion for Leave to File Out of Time Supplemental Motion to Strike Opinions of Christopher Bakewell (the “Motion for Leave”). (Dkt. No. 287.) The third is Entropic’s Supplemental Motion to Strike Opinions of Christopher Bakewell (the “Supplemental Motion to Strike). (Dkt. No.