Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Entropic Communications, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 28, 2023)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00125, Dkt. No. 352
Decided
November 28, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 171) is DENIED
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Charter Communications, Inc.’s (“Charter”) Motion to Strike Plaintiff Entropic Communications, LLC’s (“Entropic”) Secondary Considerations Positions (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 171.) In the Motion, Charter seeks to preclude Entropic from offering evidence to support its secondary consideration positions beyond the evidence disclosed in the deposition of Entropic’s Rule 30(b)(6) witness pursuant to Rules 26 and 37. ( See id. at 1– 2.) Entropic opposes the Motion. ( See Dkt. No.