Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Entropic Communications, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2023)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00125, Dkt. No. 359
Decided
November 29, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, the motion (Dkt. No. 166) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Charter Communications, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Dr. Souri’s Improper Opinions. (Dkt. No. 166.) Plaintiff Entropic Communications, LLC opposes the motion. (See Dkt. No. 205.) For the following reasons, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. BACKGROUND Dr. Souri is Entropic’s technical expert who opines on issues of infringement. Charter moves to strike various portions of his report. II.