Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Entropic Communications, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2023)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00125, Dkt. No. 158
Decided
August 29, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - denying 135 Motion for Leave to Supplement Infringement Contentions
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Supplement Infringement Contentions (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Entropic Communications, LLC (“Entropic”). (Dkt. No. 135.) In the Motion, Entropic requests that the Court grant leave so that it may supplement its infringement contentions with respect to one of the asserted patents, U.S. Patent No. 8,284,690 (the “’690 Patent”). (See id. at 1.) Defendant Charter Communications, Inc. (“Charter”) opposes the Motion. (See Dkt. No.