Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Entropic Communications, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 27, 2023)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00125, Dkt. No. 349
Decided
November 27, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 179 SEALED MOTION of Partial Summary Judgment That Devices With MaxLinear Chips are Not Non-Infringing Alternatives Affecting the Reasonable Royalty Rate filed by Entropic Communications, LLC
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Entropic Communications, LLC’s (“Entropic”) Motion F or Summary Judgment That Devices With MaxLinear Chips Are Not Non -Infringing Alternatives Affecting The Reasonable R oyalty Rate (Dkt. No. 179). For the reasons that follow, the motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART as provided below. I. BACKGROUND Entropic filed its initial complaint on April 27, 2022 asserting that Charter Communications, Inc. ( “Charter”) infringes U.S. Patent Nos.