Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Entropic Communications, LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 28, 2023)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00125, Dkt. No. 351
Decided
November 28, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - Court finds that the Motion (Dkt. No. 167) should be and hereby is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENEIED-IN-PART
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Charter Communications, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Dr. Kramer’s Improper Opinions. (Dkt. No. 167.) Plaintiff Entropic Communications, LLC opposes the motion. (See Dkt. No. 196.) For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. II. BACKGROUND Dr. Kramer is one of Entropic’s technical expert s. Dr. Kramer opines on infringement of the ’775 and ’362 Patents. Charter moves to strike various portions of his report. III.