Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00190 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Now before the Court is the Report and Recom- mendation (Dkt. No. 200) by Magi strate Judge Payne, which recommends that Garmin’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 165) be denied. Garmin has objected to the Report and Recommendation. Garmin’s Objs. (Dkt. No. 209). Garmin’s objections rely on Powertech Tech. Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., 660 F.3d 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2011).