Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00190 (E.D. Tex. July 4, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent infringement case, the Court now considers Garmin’s Opposed Motion for Leave to Serve the Supplemental Expert Report of Curtis W. Rose [Dkt. # 106]. Having reviewed the motion and Navico’s Response [Dkt. # 122], the Court will GRANT the motion. I. BACKGROUND On May 1, 2017, Garmin served the Investigative an d Forensic Analysis Report of Curtis W. Rose. The report an alyzed five computer files from Kongsberg Mesotech Ltd. and Mark Ath erton to determine the dates on which those files were created and published.