Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00190 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 6, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00190, Dkt. No. 64
Decided
February 6, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin USA, Inc. (“Garmin”)’s Opposed Motion to Transfer This Action to The Northern District of Oklahoma Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 and Opening Brief In Support (Dkt. No. 12) (“Garmin’s Motion to Transfer”), to which Plaintiffs Navico Inc. and Navico Holding AS (“Navico”) filed a Response in Opposition to (Dkt. No. 23), Garmin filed a Reply to (Dkt. No. 24) and Navico filed a Sur - Reply to (Dkt. No. 26). As set forth below, the Court DENIES Garmin’s Motion to Transfer. I.