Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00190 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 25, 2017)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00190, Dkt. No. 205
Decided
August 25, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 186 Report and Recommendation. Navicos Motion for Partial Summary Judgment That The 022 Patent is Not Unenforceable for Inequitable Conduct 105 is GRANTED
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 186) by Magistrate Judge Payne, whic h recommends that Navico’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment That The ’022 Patent is Not Unenforceable for Inequitable Conduct (Dkt. No. 105) be granted. Neither part y has filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 186) is hereby ADOPTED. Navico’s Motion (Dkt. No.