Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00190 (E.D. Tex. July 11, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00190, Dkt. No. 163
Decided
July 11, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER denying 132 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or Alternatively to Transfer Venue to the District of Kansas Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406 filed by Garmin USA, Inc., Garmin International, Inc
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or Alternatively to Transfer Venue to the District of Kansas Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (Dkt. No. 132) (“the Motion”). Having considered the Parties’ arguments, the Court DENIES the Motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Navico, Inc. and Navico Holding AS (collectively “Navico”) filed the instant suit against Defendants Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin USA, Inc. (collectively “Garmin”) on March 4, 2016 all eging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,223,022 (“the ’022 Patent”) and U.S.