Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00190 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2017)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Summary Judgment Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00190, Dkt. No. 211
Decided
August 31, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 195 Report and Recommendation. (Navicos Motion (Dkt. No. 103) is GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Navicos Motion is GRANTED with respect to the Kongsberg MS1000 System and claims 48, 49, 61, and 62…
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 195) by Magistrate Judge Payne, which recommends that Navico’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgme nt That No Asserted Claims Are Anticipated (Dkt. No. 103) be granted in part. Neither party has filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation. Having considered the Report, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 195) is hereby ADOPTED. Navico’s Motion (Dkt. No. 103) is therefore GRANTED IN PART.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case