Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Navico, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00190 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00190, Dkt. No. 190
Decided
August 8, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 161 Report and Recommendation, (Navicos Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Assignor Estoppel and the Validity of the 022 Patent (Dkt. No. 104) is DENIED) AND 166 Report and Recommendati…
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are various recommendations by Magistrate Judge Payne . Neither party has filed any objections to these recommendations. Having reviewed each Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 161) recommending denial of Navico’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Assignor Estoppel and the Validity of the ’022 Patent (Dkt. No. 104) is hereby ADOPTED. Navico’s Mo- tion (Dkt. No. 104) is therefore DENIED.