Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly and Company et al, No. 2:15-cv-01202 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01202, Dkt. No. 237
Decided
March 13, 2017
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 198 MOTION in Limine filed by Eli Lilly and Company, 207 MOTION in Limine filed by ERFINDERGEMEINSCHAFT UROPEP GbR
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are (1) Defendant Eli Lilly & Company’s Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion in Limine, Dkt. No. 198, and (2) Plaintiff UroPep’s Motions In Limine, Dkt. No. 207. Following briefing, 1 the Court heard argument on the motions on February 21, 2017. Beginning with the motions in limine of plaintiff Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR (“UroPep”), and then addressing those of defendant Eli Lilly & Co. (“Lilly ”), the dispositions of the individual motions in limine are as follows: 1.