Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly and Company et al, No. 2:15-cv-01202 (E.D. Tex. July 18, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01202, Dkt. No. 390
Decided
July 18, 2017
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 377 MOTION for Bill of Costs filed by ERFINDERGEMEINSCHAFT UROPEP GbR
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

P laintiff Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR (“UroPep”) has moved for entry of a bill of costs in this case. Dkt. No. 377. Defendant Eli Lilly and Company opposes in part. Dkt. No. 384. The motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The parties have agreed on the bulk of the issues pertaining to costs, and they have settled on an award in the amount of $100,485.08 for the unopposed costs in this case.