Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly and Company et al, No. 2:15-cv-01202 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01202, Dkt. No. 77
Decided
February 26, 2016
Judge
William C. Bryson, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The defendant Brookshire Brothers, Inc. has moved to disqualify the law firm of Fish and Richardson, P.C. (“Fish”) from serving as c ounsel for plaintiff Erfindergemeinschaft Uropep GbR (“Uropep”) in this matter. Dkt. No. 30. The Court heard argument on Brookshire’s motion on February 11, 2016. At that hear ing, the Court orally denied the motion and stated that a written opinion would follow, setting forth in mo re detail the Court’s reasons for denying the motion. The Court now reaffirms that Brookshire’s motion to disqualify is DENIED.