Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly and Company et al, No. 2:15-cv-01202 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 1, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is defendant Eli Lilly & Company’s (“Lilly”) Unopposed Motion to Seal, Dkt. No. 178, and plaintiff Erfindergemeinschaft Uropep GbR’s (“Uropep”) Unopposed Motion to Seal, Dkt. No. 185. Lilly’s motion is DENIED, and Uropep’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART . Both denials are without prejudice to the parties’ right to refile their motions upon a compelling showing of particularized need to seal certain portions of the subject material.