Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly and Company et al, No. 2:15-cv-01202 (E.D. Tex. May 18, 2017)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01202, Dkt. No. 359
Decided
May 18, 2017
Judge
William C. Bryson, Circuit Judge (sitting by designation)
Document
Order
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ERFINDERGEMEINSCHAFT UROPEP GbR, Plaintiff, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 2:15-CV-1202-WCB MEMORANDUM OPINION T his case was tried to a jury during the week of April 17, 2017. The jury returned a verdict finding that defendant Eli Lilly & Co. (“Lilly”) had infringed U.S. Patent No. 8,791,124 (“the ’124 patent”), which is owned by the plaintiff, Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR (“UroPep”).