Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly and Company et al, No. 2:15-cv-01202 (E.D. Tex. May 13, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the motion of defendant Eli Lilly & Co. (“Lilly”) for a protective order. Dkt. No. 88. The motion is DENIED. A. Background In the course of discovery in this case, th e plaintiff, Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR (“UroPep”) served Lilly with a set of 18 interrogatories. Pursuant to Rule 26(c), Fed. R. Civ. P., Lilly has moved the Court for a protective order striking UroPep’s interrogatories and requiring UroPep to serve new interrogatories in compliance with Rule 33, Fed. R. Civ. P., and the Court’s Discovery Order in this case, Dkt.