Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly and Company et al, No. 2:15-cv-01202 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 26, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:15-cv-01202, Dkt. No. 91
Decided
April 26, 2016
Judge
William C. Bryson, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the motion of defendant Eli Lilly and Company to Sever and Stay Claims Against Brookshire Brothers and to Transfer Venue to the S outhern District of Indiana. Dkt. No. 28. The Court heard argument on the motion on February 11, 2016. See Dkt. No. 82 (“Hearing Transcript”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.