Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 4:14-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2016)

Denied
Motion to Strike Daubert / Expert Challenges Contentions Claim Construction
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:14-cv-00371, Dkt. No. 328
Decided
August 22, 2016
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Strike Products Imperium Failed to Accuse in Its 029 Contentions from Imperiums Experts Report (Dkt. 135) is hereby DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Defendan…
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are several motions ruled on orally on January 29, 2016. On September 30, 2015, Defendants filed a Motion to Strike Products Imperium Failed to Accuse in Its ‘029 Contentions from Imperium’s Expert’s Report (Dkt. #135). Plaintiff filed a response on October 19, 2015 (Dkt. #145). On October 29, 2015, Defendants filed a reply (Dkt. #150). On November 9, 2015 Defendants filed a sur -reply (Dkt. #158). After consideration of the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court determined at pretrial that the motion should be denied (Trial Tr.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case