Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 4:14-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 13, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman) Ltd.’s (“Imperium”) Motion on the Appropriate Ongoing Royalty (D kt. #380). After revi ewing the relevant pleadings, the Court grants in part and denies in part Imperium’s motion. BACKGROUND On June 9, 2014, Imperium filed the instan t action against Defendants, alleging infringement of United Stat es Patent Nos. 6,271,884 (the “’884 Patent), 7,092,029 (the “’029 Patent”), and 6,836,290 (the “’290 Pa tent”).