Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 4:14-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 27, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and/or Rule 59 Motion for a New Trial (Dkt. #337). After reviewing the relevant pleadings, the Court denies Defendants’ motion. BACKGROUND On June 9, 2014, Plaintiff filed the inst ant action against Defendants, alleging infringement of United Stat es Patent Nos. 6,271,884 (the “’884 Patent), 7,092,029 (the “’029 Patent”), and 6,836,290 (the “’290 Patent”). On February 8, 2016, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff.