Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 4:14-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 27, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Judgment and for Pre- Judgment and Post-Judgment Interest (Dkt. #335). After reviewing the re levant pleadings, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff’s motion. BACKGROUND On June 9, 2014, Plaintiff filed the inst ant action against Defendants, alleging infringement of United Stat es Patent Nos. 6,271,884 (the “’884 Patent), 7,092,029 (the “’029 Patent”), and 6,836,290 (the “’290 Patent”). On February 8, 2016, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff.