Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 4:14-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. June 16, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:14-cv-00371, Dkt. No. 105
Decided
June 16, 2015
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
38 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion and Order constr ues the disputed term s in United States Patents No. 6,271,884 (“’884 Patent”), 6,836,290 (“’290 Patent”), and 7,092,029 (“’029 Patent”). Claim construction arguments were submitted in Plaintiff Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff’s”) Opening Claim Constr uction Brief (Dkt. #87), Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.’s, Sams ung Electronics America, Inc. ’s, and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.’s (“Defendants’”) Respons ive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt.