Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 4:14-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 2016)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:14-cv-00371, Dkt. No. 218
Decided
January 20, 2016
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 1/20/2016. (baf, )MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - DENYING 129 SEALED PATENT MOTION to Compel the Deposition Testimony of Alan M. Fisch filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung…
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Samsung’s Motion to Compel the Deposition Testimony of Alan M. Fisch (Dkt. #129). After reviewing the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the motion should be denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed suit against Defendants on June 9, 2014, asserting patent infringement (Dkt. #1). Defendants explain that they uncovered during discovery a series of e -mails demonstrating that in 20 11, Plaintiff engaged Mr. Alan Fisch to negotiate the sale of its patent portfolio to third parties including Mr.