Vasu Holdings, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00034 (E.D. Tex. May 1, 2026)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the Unavailability of Non- Infringing Alternatives (Dkt. No. 128.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 242), recommending denial of Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion. Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment on the Unavailability of Non- Infringing Alternatives (Dkt. No. 128) is DENIED. .