Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Vasu Holdings, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00034 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 1, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00034, Dkt. No. 257
Decided
February 1, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Opinions of Vasu’s Damages Expert Jim W. Bergman. Dkt. No. 126. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Defendant Samsung seeks to strike portions of the report of Plaintiff’s damages expert Jim W. Bergman. Bergman’s report considers the approximate value of the asserted patents and ties them to accused features of Defendants’ products. Dkt. No. 126- 2. His report then calculates damages.