Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Vasu Holdings, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00034 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 1, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00034, Dkt. No. 256
Decided
February 1, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 123 MOTION to Strike THE OPINIONS OF VASU'S SURVEY EXPERT, DR. ANDREAS GROEHN, UNDER FED. R. EVID. 702 AND DAUBERT filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.. (Motion(s)123 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Strike the Opinions of Vasu’ s Survey Expert, Dr. Andres Groehn. Dkt. No. 123. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Defendant Samsung seeks to strike portions of the report of Plaintiff’s survey expert Dr. Andres Groehn. Dr. Groehn’s report seeks to assign an economic value to the “increased battery life and the Wi-Fi/Cellular network transition” feature of the accused products. Dkt. No. 124- 2 at ¶ 15. Dr.