Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Vasu Holdings, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00034 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 1, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00034, Dkt. No. 258
Decided
February 1, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 127 SEALED MOTION to Strike and Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Julia Rowe filed by Vasu Holdings, LLC. (Motion(s)127 terminated)
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Vasu Holding, LLC’s Motion to Strike the Testimony of Julia Rowe. Dkt. No. 127. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Vasu seeks to strike portions of the expert report of Julia Rowe , Defendants ’ damages expert. Ms. Rowe’s report is relevant to the royalty calculations for four asserted patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,886,181 (“the ʼ181 Patent”), 10,206,154 (“the ʼ154 Patent”), 10,368,281 (“the ʼ281 Patent”), and 10,419,996 (“the ʼ996 Patent”). II.