Vasu Holdings, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00034 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 30, 2026)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Obviousness -Type Double Patenting (Dkt. No. 129); Defendants previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Doctrine of Equivalents (Dkt. No. 125.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 252), recommending denial of Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion for the ’996 Patent; denial as moot of Plaintiff’ s summary judgment motion for the ’281 Patent; and denial as moot for Defendants’ summary judgment motion.