Vasu Holdings, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00034 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 4, 2026)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Samsung’s Daubert Motion and Motion to Strike Expert Testimony of Dr. Todor Cooklev. Dkt. No. 131. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Defendants seek to strike portions of the report of Plaintiff’s infringement expert, Dr. Cooklev. Dr. Cooklev’s report is relevant to the infringement determination for four asserted patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 8,886,181 (“ the ʼ181 Patent”), 10,206,154 (“ the ʼ154 Patent”), 10,368,281 (“the ʼ281 Patent”), and 10,419,996 (“the ʼ996 Patent”).