Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00397 (E.D. Tex. July 29, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00397, Dkt. No. 262
Decided
July 29, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 132 Sealed Motion
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Daubert Motion and Motion to Strike Opinions of Erik de la Iglesia, filed by the AT&T Defendants. Dkt. No. 132. A substantively identical motion was filed in a parallel litigation: Headwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc., et al , 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP. See Dkt. No. 184 in 2:23- cv- 00352. For the reasons discussed in the Court’s ruling on the parallel motion (Dkt. No. 350 in 2:23-cv-00352), the instant M otion is also GRANTED as to the sections of Mr. de la Iglesia’s report that rely on Dr.