Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00397 (E.D. Tex. July 21, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00397, Dkt. No. 250
Decided
July 21, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Daubert Motion and Motion to Strike the Opinions of Dr. Richard Wesel, filed by the AT&T Defendants. Dkt. No. 131. I. BACKGROUND A substantively identical motion was filed in a parallel litigation: Headwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc., et al , 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP. See Dkt. No. 176 in 2:23- cv- 00352. The Court notes, however, that there are arguments unique to the instant Motion related to the allegedly undisclosed “firewall” theory and “ConnectivityManager API” theory, which will be taken up now. II.