Headwater Research LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00397 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants AT&T Services, Inc.; AT&T Mobility, LLC; AT&T Corp.; and AT&T Enterprises, LLC (“AT&T”) previously filed a “Motion to Dismiss No. 2: Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Rule 12(C) That the Asserted Claims Are Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101” (Dkt. No. 130); filed a “Motion to Dismiss No. 1: for Lack of Standing” (Dkt. No. 129); a “Motion for Summary Judgment No. 1: Of Non-Infringement of US Patent No. 9,215,613” (Dkt. No. 124); a “ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 5: of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.