Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00397 (E.D. Tex. July 3, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00397, Dkt. No. 238
Decided
July 3, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 118 Sealed Motion
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Sanctions Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e)(1), filed by the AT&T Defendants. Dkt. No. 118. A substantively identical motion1 was filed in a parallel litigation: Headwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc., et al , 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP. See Dkt. No. 164 in 2:23- cv-00352. For the reasons discussed in the Court’s ruling on the parallel motion (Dkt. No. 299 in 2:23-cv-00352), the instant Motion is also DENIED.