Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00397 (E.D. Tex. July 25, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00397, Dkt. No. 255
Decided
July 25, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying the 44 Sealed Motion to Disqualify McKool Smith as Counsel for Defendants
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC ’s Motion to Disqualify McKool Smith as Counsel for Defendants (Dkt. No. 44). The motion was argued at the June 26, 2025 pretrial conference in this matter. (Dkt. No. 233). It bears emphasizing that Plaintiff Headwater Research does not allege that it was ever a client of McKool Smith . Rather, the argument is that McKool ’s representation of Interdigital Inc.