Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00397 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2025)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00397, Dkt. No. 324
Decided
October 28, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 242 and 244
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC (“Headwater”) previously filed a “Motion for Summary Judgment on AT&T’s First, Fifth, Seventh, and Eleventh Affirmative Defenses ” (Dkt. No. 120); and a “Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Invalidity of Claim 18 of the '613 Patent Based on Cole and Abichandani Prior Art” (Dkt. No. 123). Magistrate Judge Payne entered Report s and Recommendation s (Dkt. No.