Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00494 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 7, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00494, Dkt. No. 252
Decided
February 7, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 127 SEALED MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF RAMAMIRTAM SUKUMAR (PLAINTIFFS SURVEY EXPERT) filed by LG Electronics USA, Inc., LG Electronics Inc.. (Motion(s)127 terminated)
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Ramamirtam Sukumar, filed by Defendants LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc.. Dkt. No. 12 7. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is DENIED. I. APPLICABLE LAW An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the t…