Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00494 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 30, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00494, Dkt. No. 224
Decided
December 30, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike the Infringement Report of Plaintiff’s expert Dr. Craig Rosenberg filed by Defendants LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc.. Dkt. No. 110. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the Motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Multimedia asserts (as is relevant to the instant Motion) that Defendants infringe ten of its patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 9,055,254; 9,237,291; 9,247,174; 9,510,040; 9,578,384; 9,820,003; 10,419,805; 9,426,527; 9,055,255; and 9,185,325. See Dkt. No.1 at 1; see also Dkt No.