Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00494 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 19, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00494, Dkt. No. 334
Decided
March 19, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 309 MOTION FOR JMOL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 50(B), OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, A NEW TRIAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 59 [RENEWED] filed by Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd.. (Motion(s)309 terminated)
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Renewed Motion for JMOL (the “Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Multimedia Technologies PTE. Ltd. (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 309). In the Motion, Plaintiff moves for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) that (1) all asserted claims of the patents -in-suit are valid and (2) Defendants LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc. (“LG”) infringe those claims. ( Id. at 1). Plaintiff also “moves for a new trial on the same grounds” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. ( Id.).