Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00494 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

LG previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. No. 24.) Magistrate Ju dge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 61), recommending grant in part and denial in part of LG’s Motion to Dismiss. Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 26) is GRANTED as to products in use prior to the issuance of the asserted patents and otherwise DENIED. .