Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00494 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 29, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00494, Dkt. No. 61
Decided
February 29, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 24 MOTION to Dismiss COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by LG Electronics USA, Inc., LG Electronics Inc
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim. ( Dkt. No. 24.) For the reasons that follow, the motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. APPLICABLE LAW A party may move to dismiss an action when the complaint fail s “to state a claim upon which relief can be granted . . . .” FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6). A complaint states a sufficient claim if it gives the defendant “ fair notice of what the … claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.” Bell Atl.