GeoDynamics, Incorporated v. DynaEnergetics US, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2018)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Defendant moves to exclude certain testimony of John Hardest y, Plaintiff’s Vice President of Technology. Def.’s Mot. to Strike [Dkt. # 115]. Defendant contends Hardesty should not be allowed to testify regarding his testing of liners from the accused products, and that his test procedure is unreliable under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 590 (1993) and its progeny. Moreover, Defendant contends Plaintiff’s other ex- perts may not testify regarding any conclusions they reached based on Hardesty’s testing.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error