GeoDynamics, Incorporated v. DynaEnergetics US, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. May 8, 2018)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION On April 2, 2018, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in United States Patent No . 8,220,394 (“the ’394 Patent”). The Court has considered the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefs. Dkt. Nos. 54, 60, 64, & 67.1 The Court has also considered the intrinsic evidence and made subsidiary factual findings about the extrinsic evidence. See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v.