Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GeoDynamics, Incorporated v. DynaEnergetics US, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00371, Dkt. No. 38
Decided
December 18, 2017
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - denying 5 Motion to Transfer Venue
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

DynaEnergetics US, Inc. (“DynaEnergetics”) moves to dismiss or transfer this patent infringement lawsuit brought by GEODynamics, Inc. (“GEODynamics”) for improper venue. Dkt. 5. For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED. DynaEnergetics is incorporated in Colorado, Dkt. 5-2 ¶ 3, and there is no dispute that venue would therefore be improper under the first prong of 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), the exclusive venue statute for patent infringement actions. See TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Grp. Brands LLC , 137 S. Ct. 1514, 1520 (2017).