Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GeoDynamics, Incorporated v. DynaEnergetics US, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-00371 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00371, Dkt. No. 226
Decided
September 30, 2018
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - denying 117 Motion to Exclude Dr. Vallerie DeLeons Testimony
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff moves to exclude the testimony of Dr. Vallerie DeLeon, one of Plaintiff’s technical experts. Def.’s Mot. [Dkt. #117]. Defendant moves to strike DeLeon’s Supplemental Report [Dkt. #147-3] and DeLeon’s Declaration [Dkt. #147-2] as improper and unti mely. Def.’s Mot. at 10–11. Defendant argues that DeLeon is not qualified to provide expert testimony on SEM testing. Id . at 12.